Triple
T11076863
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Raymond |
E261888
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTypeWithAgnes |
P10690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | secret lovers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: secret lovers | Statement: [Raymond, relationshipTypeWithAgnes, secret lovers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithAgnes Context triple: [Raymond, relationshipTypeWithAgnes, secret lovers]
-
A.
relationshipType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
B.
relationshipEnd
Indicates that a previously existing relationship between entities has been terminated or has come to an end.
-
C.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
D.
relationshipTestedBy
Indicates that a relationship between entities has been examined or evaluated by a specified agent, method, or test.
-
E.
basisOfRelationship
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, cause, or justification for the relationship that exists between two or more entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9983c08190b0ef61603b69feac |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7999407288190a901d4a2427a2102 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d74415403c81909778bcd829e8832e |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.