Triple
T11065212
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vologases IV of Parthia |
E261604
|
entity |
| Predicate | styleOnCoins |
P76968
|
FINISHED |
| Object | diademed bust |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: diademed bust | Statement: [Vologases IV of Parthia, styleOnCoins, diademed bust]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleOnCoins Context triple: [Vologases IV of Parthia, styleOnCoins, diademed bust]
-
A.
coinedDesign
chosen
Indicates that an entity originated or created a particular design or stylistic concept.
-
B.
coinageType
Indicates the specific type or category of coinage associated with an entity, such as its denomination, series, or monetary classification.
-
C.
scriptUsedOnCoins
Indicates that a particular writing system or script is used on the inscriptions appearing on coins.
-
D.
laterCoinageStyle
Indicates that one entity’s style or design is modeled after, influenced by, or characteristic of a later period of coinage relative to another.
-
E.
coinedDenomination
Indicates that an entity created or introduced a particular name, term, or denomination for something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d798edcab881909da1ba0394020ef8 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d74411d9e881908c0eeafa0f38e4b6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.