Triple

T11064944
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ala II Flavia milliaria E261598 entity
Predicate roleInRaetia P97597 FINISHED
Object protection of provincial territory LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection of provincial territory | Statement: [Ala II Flavia milliaria, roleInRaetia, protection of provincial territory]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInRaetia
Context triple: [Ala II Flavia milliaria, roleInRaetia, protection of provincial territory]
  • A. roleInNoricum
    Indicates that an entity holds or held a specific role, position, or function within the historical region or province of Noricum.
  • B. roleInRome
    Indicates that an entity holds or held a specific role, position, or function within the context of Rome or Roman society.
  • C. RomanRepresentative
    Indicates that one entity serves as an official representative or agent of the Roman state, authority, or interests in relation to another entity.
  • D. roleInGallicWars
    Indicates the role or involvement an entity had in the events or campaigns of the Gallic Wars.
  • E. wasRomanProtectorate
    Indicates that one political entity was under the protection and partial control of the Roman state as a protectorate.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d798edcab881909da1ba0394020ef8 completed April 9, 2026, 12:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d74411d9e881908c0eeafa0f38e4b6 completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d750c99f9881908ee2b01b6ce4b3a1 completed April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.