Triple
T11060835
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty of Waitangi claims process |
E261502
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | redress mechanism |
C29105
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: redress mechanism Context triple: [Treaty of Waitangi claims process, instanceOf, redress mechanism]
-
A.
community-based mechanism
A community-based mechanism is a locally driven process or structure through which community members collectively identify, decide on, and implement actions to address shared needs or manage common resources.
-
B.
United Nations special procedure mechanism
A United Nations special procedure mechanism is an independent human rights monitoring and reporting mandate—held by an individual expert or working group—established by the UN Human Rights Council to examine, advise, and publicly report on specific human rights themes or country situations.
-
C.
United Nations human rights review mechanism
A United Nations human rights review mechanism is a formal, periodic process through which UN bodies assess and monitor states’ compliance with international human rights obligations, typically involving state reports, independent expert or peer review, and public recommendations for improvement.
-
D.
conciliation commission
A conciliation commission is a temporary, impartial body established—often under international or contractual agreements—to investigate a dispute and propose nonbinding solutions aimed at amicable settlement between the parties.
-
E.
human rights monitoring mechanism
A human rights monitoring mechanism is a structured system of institutions, procedures, and tools designed to systematically observe, assess, and report on states’ compliance with international and domestic human rights obligations.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.