Triple

T11060371
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject King Abgar V of Osroene E261490 entity
Predicate historicAuthenticity P97575 FINISHED
Object partly legendary LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: partly legendary | Statement: [King Abgar V of Osroene, historicAuthenticity, partly legendary]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicAuthenticity
Context triple: [King Abgar V of Osroene, historicAuthenticity, partly legendary]
  • A. historicFor
    Indicates that something holds historical significance or importance specifically in relation to another entity.
  • B. historicCore
    Indicates that something is part of, located within, or associated with the original historic center or oldest developed area of a place.
  • C. historicalExistence
    Indicates that an entity actually existed at some point in real-world history, as opposed to being fictional, hypothetical, or mythological.
  • D. historicActivity
    Indicates that an entity engaged in an activity or event of historical significance in the past.
  • E. historicallyRich
    Indicates that an entity possesses significant historical depth, importance, or a wealth of notable past events and heritage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d798e991848190b07c2f48dae38681 completed April 9, 2026, 12:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d74411d9e881908c0eeafa0f38e4b6 completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d750c99f9881908ee2b01b6ce4b3a1 completed April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.