Triple
T11060043
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prouille, France |
E261484
|
entity |
| Predicate | conventGender |
P97571
|
FINISHED |
| Object | female religious community |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: female religious community | Statement: [Prouille, France, conventGender, female religious community]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conventGender Context triple: [Prouille, France, conventGender, female religious community]
-
A.
genderConfiguration
Indicates how the genders of the involved entities are arranged or combined within a particular relationship or context.
-
B.
genderCategories
Indicates the classification of an entity into one or more gender-related categories or identities.
-
C.
genderDivision
Indicates a relationship where roles, responsibilities, or categories are separated or distinguished based on gender.
-
D.
genderVariant
Indicates that an entity’s gender identity or expression differs from traditional or expected norms associated with their assigned sex or gender.
-
E.
genderRule
Indicates a rule or constraint that determines how gender-related properties or classifications should be assigned or interpreted in a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d798e991848190b07c2f48dae38681 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d74411d9e881908c0eeafa0f38e4b6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d750c99f9881908ee2b01b6ce4b3a1 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.