Triple
T11057575
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chasselas wine |
E261417
|
entity |
| Predicate | wineStyleFamily |
P2082
|
FINISHED |
| Object | still wine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: still wine | Statement: [Chasselas wine, wineStyleFamily, still wine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wineStyleFamily Context triple: [Chasselas wine, wineStyleFamily, still wine]
-
A.
wineStyle
chosen
Indicates the stylistic category or type of wine (such as its production style, sweetness, body, or other defining characteristics) associated with an entity.
-
B.
wineVariety
Indicates the specific type or variety of wine associated with an entity.
-
C.
wineCategory
Indicates the classification or type of wine that an entity (such as a specific wine) belongs to.
-
D.
wineStylesAssociatedWith
Indicates a relationship where certain wine styles are linked or connected to a particular entity, such as a region, grape, producer, or product.
-
E.
wineStructure
Indicates the overall sensory framework of a wine, encompassing how its components like acidity, tannin, body, and alcohol are balanced and interact.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d798a2efa48190b290f43dfe836501 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7440da46c8190a77380d5d747ac9c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.