Triple
T11057000
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Walker |
E261400
|
entity |
| Predicate | appealCondemned |
P97556
|
FINISHED |
| Object | slavery as a sin against God |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: slavery as a sin against God | Statement: [David Walker, appealCondemned, slavery as a sin against God]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appealCondemned Context triple: [David Walker, appealCondemned, slavery as a sin against God]
-
A.
condemnedIn
Indicates that an entity was formally denounced, sentenced, or declared guilty within a particular place, context, or proceeding.
-
B.
condemnedBy
Indicates that an entity is judged, denounced, or declared wrong or unacceptable by another entity.
-
C.
condemnedAs
Indicates that one entity formally or strongly denounces another entity by labeling it as wrong, guilty, or unacceptable.
-
D.
timeOfCondemnation
Indicates the specific time at which a condemnation (such as a legal judgment or formal denunciation) occurs or is issued.
-
E.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d798a2404c819090cb0825a67a64fa |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7440da46c8190a77380d5d747ac9c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d750c99f9881908ee2b01b6ce4b3a1 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.