Triple

T11055098
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Luther v. Borden E261352 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon E261353 NE FINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon | Statement: [Luther v. Borden, relatedCase, Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon]

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon
Context triple: [Luther v. Borden, relatedCase, Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon]
  • A. Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon chosen
    Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon is a 1912 U.S. Supreme Court case that held challenges to state initiatives under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause present nonjusticiable political questions beyond the Court’s authority to decide.
  • B. De Jonge v. Oregon
    De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
  • C. United States v. AT&T
    United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
  • D. Oregon v. Elstad
    Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
  • E. Oregon v. Mitchell
    Oregon v. Mitchell was a 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of federal laws regulating state and local election procedures, including provisions of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 elicitation completed
NER batch_69d798a0890481909c1d4f9d5b23f33a ner completed
NED1 batch_69e3c86e0e6481908f091497313132c1 ned_source_triple completed
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.