Triple

T11054980
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Coyle v. Smith E261350 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Coyle v. Smith, Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma E261350 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Coyle v. Smith, Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma | Statement: [Coyle v. Smith, fullCaseName, Coyle v. Smith, Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Coyle v. Smith, Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma
Context triple: [Coyle v. Smith, fullCaseName, Coyle v. Smith, Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma]
  • A. Coyle v. Smith chosen
    Coyle v. Smith was a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court case that held Congress cannot dictate the permanent location of a state’s capital as a condition of its admission to the Union, affirming the equal footing of new states with existing ones.
  • B. Collin v. Smith
    Collin v. Smith is a U.S. federal court case that addressed the constitutionality of local ordinances restricting a planned Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, ultimately affirming strong First Amendment protections for offensive political speech.
  • C. Oklahoma v. Texas (1921)
    Oklahoma v. Texas (1921) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that resolved a boundary dispute between the states of Oklahoma and Texas, particularly concerning ownership and jurisdiction over parts of the Red River region.
  • D. Skinner v. Oklahoma
    Skinner v. Oklahoma is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law mandating the sterilization of certain criminal offenders, recognizing procreation as a fundamental right under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • E. Corfield v. Coryell
    Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d798a0890481909c1d4f9d5b23f33a completed April 9, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e3c86052148190adfc250c3dd27094 completed April 18, 2026, 6:07 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.