Triple
T11054881
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prigg v. Pennsylvania |
E261348
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fugitive slave law case |
C29090
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: fugitive slave law case Context triple: [Prigg v. Pennsylvania, instanceOf, fugitive slave law case]
-
A.
fugitive slave law
Fugitive slave law refers to statutes enacted in the United States before the Civil War that required escaped enslaved people to be returned to their enslavers, even from free states, and imposed penalties on those who aided their escape.
-
B.
slavery debate
A slavery debate is a structured discussion or argument in which participants examine, defend, or challenge the moral, legal, economic, and social justifications for the institution of slavery.
-
C.
Underground Railroad document
An Underground Railroad document is a historical record—such as letters, maps, narratives, or legal papers—that provides evidence of the people, routes, operations, and experiences associated with the clandestine network that aided enslaved individuals in escaping to freedom.
-
D.
colonial legal case
A colonial legal case is a formal dispute or prosecution adjudicated within a legal system established by a colonial power over a subject territory, reflecting the laws, institutions, and power dynamics of colonial rule.
-
E.
Miranda doctrine case
A Miranda doctrine case is a legal case that addresses the application, scope, or interpretation of the constitutional requirement that law enforcement advise individuals of their rights (such as the right to remain silent and to an attorney) before custodial interrogation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.