Triple
T11054736
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Texas v. White |
E261344
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguageOfDecision |
P2281
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Texas v. White, hasLanguageOfDecision, English]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguageOfDecision Context triple: [Texas v. White, hasLanguageOfDecision, English]
-
A.
decisionLanguage
chosen
Indicates that a decision, statement, or choice is expressed or recorded in a particular natural language.
-
B.
eligibleLanguage
Indicates that a particular language satisfies the required conditions to be considered valid or allowed in a given context.
-
C.
isLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
-
D.
hasRepresentativeLanguage
Indicates that an entity is associated with a language that serves as its primary or officially recognized means of representation or communication.
-
E.
hasLanguageOfSurroundingCountries
Indicates that an entity uses or includes the languages commonly spoken in the countries that geographically surround it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d798a0890481909c1d4f9d5b23f33a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7440da46c8190a77380d5d747ac9c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.