Triple

T11054695
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Texas v. White E261344 entity
Predicate hasFullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Texas v. White et al. E261344 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas v. White et al. | Statement: [Texas v. White, hasFullCaseName, Texas v. White et al.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Texas v. White et al.
Context triple: [Texas v. White, hasFullCaseName, Texas v. White et al.]
  • A. Texas v. White chosen
    Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
  • B. Alabama v. Texas
    Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
  • C. California v. Texas
    California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
  • D. Branch v. Texas
    Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
  • E. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d798a0890481909c1d4f9d5b23f33a completed April 9, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e3c86052148190adfc250c3dd27094 completed April 18, 2026, 6:07 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.