Triple
T11053604
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Naval Battle of Lissa |
E261317
|
entity |
| Predicate | navalTacticUsed |
P30685
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ramming |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ramming | Statement: [Naval Battle of Lissa, navalTacticUsed, ramming]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: navalTacticUsed Context triple: [Naval Battle of Lissa, navalTacticUsed, ramming]
-
A.
navalTacticRole
Indicates the specific tactical function or role an entity performs within a naval operation or maritime combat context.
-
B.
militaryTacticsUsed
chosen
Indicates that specific military tactics are employed or applied in the context of a particular operation, conflict, or strategic situation.
-
C.
navalOperations
Indicates involvement in planning, conducting, or supporting military activities carried out by naval forces at sea or from the sea.
-
D.
navalOperationsBy
Indicates that a set of naval operations is conducted, controlled, or carried out by a specified agent or organization.
-
E.
navalCommand
Indicates a relationship where one entity holds authority to direct, control, or oversee naval forces or maritime military operations involving another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7986d49e0819096c9e96b2ea1b38b |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7440da46c8190a77380d5d747ac9c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.