Triple
T11049551
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Happy Feet |
E261209
|
entity |
| Predicate | cinematographyBy |
P1953
|
FINISHED |
| Object | David Peers |
E858937
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: David Peers | Statement: [Happy Feet, cinematographyBy, David Peers]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: David Peers Context triple: [Happy Feet, cinematographyBy, David Peers]
-
A.
David Peers
chosen
David Peers is a cinematographer known for his work on animated feature films, including the movie "Ron’s Gone Wrong."
-
B.
Nicholas Wisdom
Nicholas Wisdom is a British philosopher known for his work in the philosophy of mind and language, and as the son of comedian Norman Wisdom.
-
C.
Ryan Harrison
Ryan Harrison is an American professional tennis player known for his powerful serve and success on the ATP Tour in both singles and doubles.
-
D.
James Hewitt
James Hewitt is a former British cavalry officer best known for his romantic relationship with Diana, Princess of Wales, during the late 1980s and early 1990s.
-
E.
Luke Saville Groth
Luke Saville Groth is an individual notable enough to be recognized as a prominent bearer of the surname Groth.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d79868c78881908c8e3672c05ae7ec |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:15 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e3aa06bae08190a0db615a258ded29 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.