Triple
T11047953
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Black Speech |
E261177
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPartialGrammar |
P97489
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Black Speech, hasPartialGrammar, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPartialGrammar Context triple: [Black Speech, hasPartialGrammar, yes]
-
A.
hasGrammar
Indicates that an entity possesses, follows, or is associated with a particular system of grammatical rules or structure.
-
B.
hasKnownGrammar
Indicates that an entity is associated with a grammar whose structure and rules are already defined or understood.
-
C.
hasAnalyticGrammar
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by an analytic grammar, where grammatical relationships are expressed primarily through separate words rather than inflection.
-
D.
hasReferenceGrammar
Indicates that an entity is associated with or described by a specific reference grammar resource.
-
E.
hasReferenceGrammarBy
Indicates that an entity is associated with or described by a reference grammar authored or compiled by a specified agent.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d798315b988190bc565581b2664009 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d74407cb088190ba37c8da3d342b64 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d750c99f9881908ee2b01b6ce4b3a1 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.