Triple

T11039146
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Småland E260962 entity
Predicate hasCity P316 FINISHED
Object Ljungby E854805 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ljungby | Statement: [Småland, hasCity, Ljungby]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ljungby
Context triple: [Småland, hasCity, Ljungby]
  • A. Ljungby chosen
    Ljungby is a small Swedish town in southern Småland known for its lakeside surroundings, forestry-based economy, and role as a local commercial and cultural center.
  • B. Ronneby
    Ronneby is a historic town in southern Sweden known for its well-preserved wooden architecture, spa traditions, and scenic location in Blekinge County.
  • C. Mjölby
    Mjölby is a small Swedish town known for its agricultural surroundings and location in the southern part of Östergötland County.
  • D. Sandviken
    Sandviken is an industrial town in central Sweden, best known as the historic home of the steel company Sandvik.
  • E. Hörby
    Hörby is a small municipality in southern Sweden’s Skåne County, known for its rural landscape and traditional Swedish town character.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa979bdc8190bf0e79104cc098c1 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d797fe93b081909d58bfd4b42715f0 completed April 9, 2026, 12:13 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e3e73e7f68819097213e4601c07ee8 completed April 18, 2026, 8:19 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.