Triple

T11037309
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lady Catherine de Bourgh E260918 entity
Predicate mannerOfSpeech P35511 FINISHED
Object authoritative LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: authoritative | Statement: [Lady Catherine de Bourgh, mannerOfSpeech, authoritative]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mannerOfSpeech
Context triple: [Lady Catherine de Bourgh, mannerOfSpeech, authoritative]
  • A. languageModality
    Indicates the mode or form in which a language is expressed or perceived (e.g., spoken, signed, written, or tactile).
  • B. speechType
    Indicates the specific category or form of spoken or written communication that an utterance or speech act belongs to (e.g., question, statement, command).
  • C. rhetoricalStyle chosen
    Indicates the characteristic manner or technique of expression used in communication, such as tone, structure, and persuasive strategies.
  • D. spokenVsWritten
    Indicates that the relationship contrasts or distinguishes between spoken and written forms of the same content or expression.
  • E. speechAct
    Indicates that one entity performs a communicative action (such as stating, asking, commanding, or promising) directed toward another entity or audience.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa979bdc8190bf0e79104cc098c1 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d797fd5fe081908af13835b18de7b8 completed April 9, 2026, 12:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d74407cb088190ba37c8da3d342b64 completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:25 p.m.