Triple

T11028256
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BJ E260687 entity
Predicate underlyingCompanyCustomerType P97362 FINISHED
Object members LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: members | Statement: [BJ, underlyingCompanyCustomerType, members]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: underlyingCompanyCustomerType
Context triple: [BJ, underlyingCompanyCustomerType, members]
  • A. underlyingCompanyType
    Indicates the classification or category of company that forms the basis or source for another related entity or instrument.
  • B. issuerCustomerType
    Indicates the type or category of customer associated with or defined by the issuer.
  • C. hasUnderlyingCompanyEmployeeType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or category of company employee that underlies or characterizes its role or status.
  • D. customerType
    Indicates the classification or category assigned to a customer based on their characteristics, status, or relationship with a business.
  • E. underlyingCompany
    Indicates that one entity serves as the fundamental or base company upon which another entity (such as a product, instrument, or structure) is built, derived, or dependent.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa979bdc8190bf0e79104cc098c1 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d797d245a0819085135cdee9b256c5 completed April 9, 2026, 12:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d7440087ac8190aef2e6f6b13b2635 completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d750c99f9881908ee2b01b6ce4b3a1 completed April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:25 p.m.