Triple
T11019150
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | L’isle joyeuse |
E260439
|
entity |
| Predicate | closingKeyArea |
P96598
|
FINISHED |
| Object | A major |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: A major | Statement: [L’isle joyeuse, closingKeyArea, A major]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: closingKeyArea Context triple: [L’isle joyeuse, closingKeyArea, A major]
-
A.
closingFeatures
Indicates that an entity has specific characteristics, terms, or attributes associated with the act or process of closing (e.g., ending, shutting down, or finalizing something).
-
B.
closureBy
Indicates that one entity causes, performs, or is responsible for the closing or termination of another entity, event, or process.
-
C.
closureReason
Indicates the reason or cause for which an entity, process, or case has been closed or terminated.
-
D.
closingContains
Indicates that one closing element, event, or period fully includes another within its temporal or structural bounds.
-
E.
closingForm
Indicates that one entity serves as the closing or concluding form, version, or configuration of another entity or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9687448190b28d353b1b6a610e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d797a9e8788190a0f45b52bad1bfb5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d72e995e008190bbffb314129ed0cd |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d732242fdc8190be77d1f730a42935 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:25 p.m.