Triple
T11016591
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Enterprise Objects Framework |
E260380
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | persistence framework |
C23126
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: persistence framework Context triple: [Enterprise Objects Framework, instanceOf, persistence framework]
-
A.
Object-relational mapping framework
chosen
An object-relational mapping framework is a software layer that automatically maps objects in application code to records in a relational database, allowing developers to interact with data using object-oriented paradigms instead of SQL.
-
B.
Object–relational mapping tool
An object–relational mapping tool is a software library or framework that automatically maps objects in application code to rows in a relational database, allowing developers to work with data using object-oriented paradigms instead of SQL.
-
C.
object-oriented framework
An object-oriented framework is a reusable, extensible software structure that defines cooperating classes and interfaces to provide a common architecture for building applications in a specific domain.
-
D.
database
A database is an organized collection of structured or unstructured data stored and managed in a way that enables efficient retrieval, modification, and administration.
-
E.
enterprise application framework
An enterprise application framework is a reusable, extensible software infrastructure that provides standardized components, patterns, and services to simplify the development, integration, and maintenance of large-scale business applications.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9687448190b28d353b1b6a610e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:25 p.m.