Triple

T1100866
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heman the Ezrahite E24375 entity
Predicate hasUncertainDetails P9778 FINISHED
Object genealogy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: genealogy | Statement: [Heman the Ezrahite, hasUncertainDetails, genealogy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUncertainDetails
Context triple: [Heman the Ezrahite, hasUncertainDetails, genealogy]
  • A. hasUncertainty chosen
    Indicates that the relationship or value is associated with some level or type of uncertainty rather than being fully definite or precise.
  • B. hasUncertainBoundary
    Indicates that the boundary or extent of something is not clearly defined, fixed, or precisely known.
  • C. hasLie
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or responsible for a specific lie or false statement.
  • D. uncertainty
    Indicates that there is doubt, lack of sureness, or incomplete confidence about a fact, outcome, or state of affairs in the relationship or situation described.
  • E. isPoorlyAttested
    Indicates that there is limited, weak, or unreliable evidence or documentation supporting the existence, usage, or occurrence of the related item or relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4940542308190ac2a0b1f730b7cfc completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b9c079f48190a0e0ddda182f7a01 completed March 1, 2026, 10:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b745ef3481909a7ce4647c8567b3 completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.