Triple

T11007567
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Crimean Tatar toponyms E260160 entity
Predicate containSemanticFields P91671 FINISHED
Object geographical features LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: geographical features | Statement: [Crimean Tatar toponyms, containSemanticFields, geographical features]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containSemanticFields
Context triple: [Crimean Tatar toponyms, containSemanticFields, geographical features]
  • A. hasSemantics
    Indicates that one entity carries or encodes the meaning, interpretation, or semantic content associated with another entity.
  • B. hasSemanticRestriction
    Indicates that a concept or relation is constrained in meaning or usage by specific semantic conditions or limitations.
  • C. hasSemanticsDefinedBy
    Indicates that the meaning or interpretation of one entity is specified, constrained, or determined by another entity.
  • D. семантическоеПоле chosen
    Indicates that entities are related by belonging to the same semantic field, i.e., they share a common area of meaning or conceptual domain.
  • E. containsAsSubfield
    Indicates that one field or data structure includes another field as a nested or component subfield within it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa8a6a548190a750f944ccdc8064 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d79757bdcc8190900b267826eece21 completed April 9, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d72e96be6c8190a46c69f61b2d8cd4 completed April 9, 2026, 4:44 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:25 p.m.