Triple
T10991265
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hilbert–Pólya conjecture |
E259757
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimsAbout |
P72385
|
FINISHED |
| Object | location of nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: location of nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function | Statement: [Hilbert–Pólya conjecture, claimsAbout, location of nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimsAbout Context triple: [Hilbert–Pólya conjecture, claimsAbout, location of nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function]
-
A.
claimsToBe
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
-
B.
claimsToDescribe
Indicates that one entity asserts that it provides an accurate or valid description of another entity or concept.
-
C.
claimsToExplain
Indicates that one entity asserts it can provide a clarification, account, or understanding of another entity or phenomenon.
-
D.
saidAbout
chosen
Indicates that a statement or assertion has been made concerning or in reference to a particular entity or subject.
-
E.
claimsAboutLogic
Indicates that one entity makes statements or assertions concerning the principles, rules, or properties of logic in relation to another entity or topic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8a6a548190a750f944ccdc8064 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d795d1e918819090c71f5a077fa15a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d72e93ac648190b46c5d12bf3eb1e9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:24 p.m.