Triple
T10976872
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Three Crowns of Sweden |
E259391
|
entity |
| Predicate | disputeTopic |
P50823
|
FINISHED |
| Object | right to use three crowns in heraldry |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: right to use three crowns in heraldry | Statement: [Three Crowns of Sweden, disputeTopic, right to use three crowns in heraldry]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disputeTopic Context triple: [Three Crowns of Sweden, disputeTopic, right to use three crowns in heraldry]
-
A.
disputeInvolves
Indicates that a particular dispute includes or concerns the specified entities as participants or parties to the conflict.
-
B.
disputeOrigin
Indicates that there is disagreement or uncertainty about the source, cause, or initial point of something.
-
C.
disputed
chosen
Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
-
D.
disputeBecameProminent
Indicates that a dispute increased in visibility or significance to the point of attracting widespread attention or recognition.
-
E.
originatingDispute
Indicates that one entity is the source, cause, or initial context of a particular dispute involving another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa895f4c8190887a15460ef622f4 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d771f5bef481909043656c571fda89 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d72e9055908190b438f039574aaaaf |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:24 p.m.