Triple
T10961242
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lockinge Stakes |
E258977
|
entity |
| Predicate | upgradedToGroup1 |
P96864
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1995 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1995 | Statement: [Lockinge Stakes, upgradedToGroup1, 1995]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: upgradedToGroup1 Context triple: [Lockinge Stakes, upgradedToGroup1, 1995]
-
A.
wasUpgradedFor
Indicates that one entity was improved, enhanced, or updated specifically to serve, benefit, or be compatible with another entity.
-
B.
upgradedBy
Indicates that an entity has been improved, enhanced, or moved to a higher version or level as a result of actions performed by another entity.
-
C.
upgradedStatusTo
Indicates that one entity has changed another entity’s status or level to a higher or more advanced state.
-
D.
partlyUpgradedTo
Indicates that an entity has undergone an incomplete or partial upgrade to another specified state, version, or configuration.
-
E.
upgradesFrom
Indicates that one entity is a newer or improved version that replaces or enhances another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa88500c819097d7032ca578e74f |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7712bf65c8190b847784d885876fd |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d72e874f48819096ffa878f90c7d5b |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d7322370648190ba14cdd6fb4cdcb0 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m.