Triple
T1095814
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | K⁺ |
E24268
|
entity |
| Predicate | isAntiparticleOf |
P3975
|
FINISHED |
| Object | K⁻ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: K⁻ | Statement: [K⁺, isAntiparticleOf, K⁻]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAntiparticleOf Context triple: [K⁺, isAntiparticleOf, K⁻]
-
A.
isOwnAntiparticle
Indicates that an entity is identical to its own antiparticle, meaning it serves simultaneously as both particle and antiparticle in that relationship.
-
B.
isGaugeBosonOf
Indicates that one particle serves as the gauge boson mediating the fundamental interaction associated with another entity (such as a force or symmetry group).
-
C.
hasChargeConjugation
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the charge-conjugated counterpart (particle vs. antiparticle form) of another entity.
-
D.
isBoson
Indicates that the subject is a boson, i.e., a particle that follows Bose–Einstein statistics and typically mediates forces or can occupy the same quantum state as others.
-
E.
hasWeakIsospin
Indicates that an entity possesses a specified value of weak isospin, representing its charge under the weak nuclear interaction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4940542308190ac2a0b1f730b7cfc |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b99ffb3481908cd168b6c58e1c6d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b7448c148190a3c9a4158ebd05b4 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.