Triple
T10957652
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Army of the Three Guarantees |
E258885
|
entity |
| Predicate | guaranteeRepresentedByGreen |
P38847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | independence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: independence | Statement: [Army of the Three Guarantees, guaranteeRepresentedByGreen, independence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: guaranteeRepresentedByGreen Context triple: [Army of the Three Guarantees, guaranteeRepresentedByGreen, independence]
-
A.
greenRepresents
chosen
Indicates that one entity uses the color green to symbolize, denote, or stand for another entity or concept.
-
B.
guaranteedFor
Indicates that one entity provides an assurance or warranty that remains valid for another entity over a specified period or under certain conditions.
-
C.
hasGreenType
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a type classified as green.
-
D.
areRepresentedBy
Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, proxy, or stand-in for another entity.
-
E.
guaranteeStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a guarantee associated with an entity or agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa88500c819097d7032ca578e74f |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d77126d9288190aa5daf2ba83d731d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d72e874f48819096ffa878f90c7d5b |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m.