Triple
T10957283
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Choeropsis liberiensis |
E258877
|
entity |
| Predicate | breedingInCaptivity |
P28094
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Choeropsis liberiensis, breedingInCaptivity, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: breedingInCaptivity Context triple: [Choeropsis liberiensis, breedingInCaptivity, yes]
-
A.
reproductionInCaptivity
chosen
Indicates that an organism reproduces successfully while being kept in a controlled or captive environment rather than in the wild.
-
B.
breedingUse
Indicates that one entity is used for breeding or reproductive purposes with respect to another entity.
-
C.
breedingMethod
Indicates the technique or process by which organisms are bred or reproduced.
-
D.
breedingNote
Indicates notes or remarks documenting details, conditions, or observations related to a breeding event or process between entities.
-
E.
breedingStatus
Indicates the reproductive condition or phase an entity is currently in, such as whether it is capable of, engaged in, or excluded from breeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa88500c819097d7032ca578e74f |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d771260e9881909401a7a7466e1b8a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d72e874f48819096ffa878f90c7d5b |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m.