Triple
T10946589
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brașov County |
E258611
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Râșnov |
E896588
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Râșnov | Statement: [Brașov County, hasTown, Râșnov]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Râșnov Context triple: [Brașov County, hasTown, Râșnov]
-
A.
Râșnov
chosen
Râșnov is a Romanian town in Transylvania best known for its medieval hilltop fortress and scenic location near Brașov and the Carpathian Mountains.
-
B.
Rădăuți
Rădăuți is a historic town in northeastern Romania known for its cultural heritage and proximity to the painted monasteries of Bukovina.
-
C.
Zărnești
Zărnești is a small Romanian town in Brașov County, known as a key gateway to the Piatra Craiului Mountains and a popular base for hiking and nature tourism in the Carpathians.
-
D.
Rășinari
Rășinari is a traditional Transylvanian village in Sibiu County, Romania, known for its pastoral setting and as the birthplace of philosopher Emil Cioran.
-
E.
Bușteni
Bușteni is a Romanian mountain resort town in the Prahova Valley, known for its access to the Bucegi Mountains and popular skiing and hiking opportunities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8769b4819082bfe5e61b9017f0 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d770eaaea08190b06e508600d8a305 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:27 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e3e6fd11b08190b587bebf9586f754 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m.