Triple
T10946586
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brașov County |
E258611
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMunicipality |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Făgăraș |
E269160
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Făgăraș | Statement: [Brașov County, hasMunicipality, Făgăraș]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Făgăraș Context triple: [Brașov County, hasMunicipality, Făgăraș]
-
A.
Făgăraș
chosen
Făgăraș is a town in central Romania, situated near the Făgăraș Mountains in Transylvania and known for its historic fortress and scenic surroundings.
-
B.
Vulcănești
Vulcănești is a town in southern Moldova that serves as one of the key urban centers of the autonomous region of Gagauzia.
-
C.
Crișul Alb
Crișul Alb is a river in western Romania that flows through the historical region of Crișana before joining the Körös (Criș) river system.
-
D.
Zărnești
Zărnești is a small Romanian town in Brașov County, known as a key gateway to the Piatra Craiului Mountains and a popular base for hiking and nature tourism in the Carpathians.
-
E.
Oltenița
Oltenița is a town in southern Romania on the banks of the Danube River, historically noted as the site of the Battle of Oltenitza during the Crimean War.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8769b4819082bfe5e61b9017f0 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d770eaaea08190b06e508600d8a305 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:27 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e3c7fbf1e08190867151b624a2ee70 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m.