Triple
T10941594
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cheatham County |
E258485
|
entity |
| Predicate | largestCity |
P235
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ashland City |
E424613
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ashland City | Statement: [Cheatham County, largestCity, Ashland City]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ashland City Context triple: [Cheatham County, largestCity, Ashland City]
-
A.
Ashland City, Tennessee
chosen
Ashland City, Tennessee is a small town in Cheatham County that serves as a suburban community within the greater Nashville metropolitan area in Middle Tennessee.
-
B.
Ashland
Ashland is a Chicago 'L' rapid transit station on the CTA's Pink Line serving the city's Near West Side.
-
C.
Ashland
Ashland is a small city in southern Oregon known for its vibrant arts scene, including the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, and its proximity to outdoor recreation areas.
-
D.
Ashland
Ashland is an unincorporated community in Alameda County, California, situated in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area.
-
E.
Ashland
Ashland is a small borough in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, historically known for its anthracite coal mining heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8769b4819082bfe5e61b9017f0 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d770c33a7c8190b3347944f68ee431 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:26 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e2d722972c8190b14637dc9e52ce11 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m.