Triple

T10931463
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hunkpapa Lakota E258216 entity
Predicate language P15 FINISHED
Object Lakota language E104445 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lakota language | Statement: [Hunkpapa Lakota, language, Lakota language]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lakota language
Context triple: [Hunkpapa Lakota, language, Lakota language]
  • A. Lakota language chosen
    The Lakota language is a Native American Siouan language spoken by the Lakota people, known for its rich oral tradition and ongoing revitalization efforts.
  • B. Dakota language
    The Dakota language is a Siouan language spoken by the Dakota (Eastern Sioux) people of the Northern Plains region of North America.
  • C. Lakota
    The Lakota are a Native American people of the Great Plains, known as one of the three main divisions of the Sioux and for their warrior culture and resistance to U.S. expansion in the 19th century.
  • D. Arikara language
    The Arikara language is a critically endangered Caddoan language traditionally spoken by the Arikara people of the Northern Plains in the United States.
  • E. Osage language
    The Osage language is a Siouan language traditionally spoken by the Osage people of the central United States, now the focus of revitalization and preservation efforts.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa8769b4819082bfe5e61b9017f0 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d770a062f481908beb76c6dbaeb6a6 completed April 9, 2026, 9:25 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e3a92e09648190ab39053521211743 completed April 18, 2026, 3:54 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m.