Triple
T10928749
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 1665 |
E258142
|
entity |
| Predicate | protocolDomain |
P80109
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Internet routing |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Internet routing | Statement: [RFC 1665, protocolDomain, Internet routing]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: protocolDomain Context triple: [RFC 1665, protocolDomain, Internet routing]
-
A.
networkProtocolDomain
chosen
Indicates the network protocol or protocol family within which a given communication, service, or interaction operates.
-
B.
protocolName
Indicates the specific communication or interaction protocol used or associated with an entity or connection.
-
C.
protocol
Indicates that one entity defines or follows a specific set of rules or procedures governing how it interacts or communicates with another entity.
-
D.
protocolDefined
Indicates that a specific protocol formally specifies or governs the behavior, format, or interaction associated with the related entities.
-
E.
protocols
Indicates that one entity defines, uses, or adheres to a specified set of rules or procedures governing how it interacts or communicates with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa864ed88190818280ab6791d065 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7709eb0ec819093f7d3f99097bbe4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d72e799f808190b6ab64fc7586a303 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:22 p.m.