Triple
T10923518
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lake Constance region |
E258004
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Thurgau |
E285688
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thurgau | Statement: [Lake Constance region, borders, Thurgau]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thurgau Context triple: [Lake Constance region, borders, Thurgau]
-
A.
Thurgau
chosen
Thurgau is a canton in northeastern Switzerland known for its agriculture, particularly apple orchards and vineyards, and its location along Lake Constance.
-
B.
Glarus
Glarus is a mountainous canton in eastern Switzerland known for its alpine landscapes, textile industry history, and early adoption of progressive democratic reforms.
-
C.
Baselland
Baselland is a canton in northwestern Switzerland known for its mix of industrial centers, rural landscapes, and proximity to the city of Basel.
-
D.
Attiswil
Attiswil is a municipality in the canton of Bern in Switzerland, located in the Oberaargau region.
-
E.
Brugg District
Brugg District is an administrative district in the canton of Aargau in northern Switzerland, known for its historic town of Brugg and its location along the Aare River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa864ed88190818280ab6791d065 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7708e3fd881908da10f24a856364c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:25 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e2172894d88190b7b27f78e9fd1521 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:22 p.m.