Triple
T1091861
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jim |
E24180
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalFormOfAddress |
P12836
|
FINISHED |
| Object | informal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: informal | Statement: [Jim, typicalFormOfAddress, informal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalFormOfAddress Context triple: [Jim, typicalFormOfAddress, informal]
-
A.
typicalForm
Indicates that one entity represents the standard, characteristic, or most common form or shape in which another entity typically appears or is realized.
-
B.
isStyleOfAddress
chosen
Indicates that one term or expression functions as a particular way of addressing or referring to another entity.
-
C.
addressFormFor
Indicates the form of address or mode of speaking that one entity should use when referring to or speaking to another entity.
-
D.
honorificType
Indicates the type or category of honorific or formal title associated with an entity in a given context.
-
E.
honorificPrefix
Indicates the formal title or respectful prefix (e.g., "Dr.", "Mr.", "Prof.") used before a person's name to denote status, role, or honor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49404428c819092dcc9632f5f7b8b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b982018481908b222df095e318c0 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b741b0cc8190be001a16a81f6d9e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.