Triple

T10896951
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gouet E257333 entity
Predicate relationshipToChardonnay P96286 FINISHED
Object parent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: parent | Statement: [Gouet, relationshipToChardonnay, parent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToChardonnay
Context triple: [Gouet, relationshipToChardonnay, parent]
  • A. sharesGrandCruVineyardsWith
    Indicates that two entities share ownership, use, or association with the same Grand Cru–classified vineyards.
  • B. distinctionFromOtherPinots
    Indicates that something is being differentiated or set apart from other entities classified as Pinot, highlighting its unique characteristics or identity relative to them.
  • C. hasWinemaker
    Indicates that one entity serves as the winemaker responsible for producing or overseeing the production of wine for another entity.
  • D. wineStyleComparedTo
    Indicates a comparison between wines in terms of their style or stylistic characteristics.
  • E. usesWineType
    Indicates that one entity makes use of, incorporates, or is associated with a particular type or category of wine.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa8550c8819095508a2ed9acf3db completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d75d02e4c88190b8286078e90bf913 completed April 9, 2026, 8:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d70d3943c881908895397eccc3e415 completed April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d7101de31c819090707635f6790559 completed April 9, 2026, 2:34 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.