Triple
T10892033
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ASK/Ogre |
E257200
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleInDevelopment |
P13609
|
FINISHED |
| Object | developed Oleg Znarok as a player |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: developed Oleg Znarok as a player | Statement: [ASK/Ogre, roleInDevelopment, developed Oleg Znarok as a player]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInDevelopment Context triple: [ASK/Ogre, roleInDevelopment, developed Oleg Znarok as a player]
-
A.
developmentRole
chosen
Indicates that an entity participates in the creation, design, or production of another entity in a specific developmental capacity or function.
-
B.
plannedRole
Indicates that an entity is expected or intended to assume a particular role or function in a planned or future context.
-
C.
designedRole
Indicates that one entity has been created, configured, or intended to serve a particular function, purpose, or role in relation to another entity.
-
D.
roleInTheory
Indicates the specific function, position, or contribution that an entity has within a particular theory or theoretical framework.
-
E.
roleInGemini3
Indicates that an entity holds a specific role or function within the Gemini 3 mission or project.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8550c8819095508a2ed9acf3db |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d75206354881908b148f2df3938513 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d70d3943c881908895397eccc3e415 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.