Triple
T1088847
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lander County |
E24114
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | county in Nevada |
C4699
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: county in Nevada Context triple: [Lander County, instanceOf, county in Nevada]
-
A.
county in California
A county in California is a regional administrative division of the state that provides local government services, enforces state laws, and manages public resources for the communities within its geographic boundaries.
-
B.
county of California
A county of California is a regional administrative division of the state that provides local government services, governance, and jurisdiction over a defined geographic area and its residents.
-
C.
county of Colorado
A county of Colorado is an administrative subdivision of the state that serves as a local level of government, providing regional services, governance, and jurisdictional organization for its communities and unincorporated areas.
-
D.
county of Arizona
A county of Arizona is a primary local government and administrative division within the state of Arizona, responsible for regional services such as law enforcement, courts, public records, and infrastructure across its defined geographic area.
-
E.
county in the United States
chosen
A county in the United States is a local administrative and political subdivision of a state (or equivalent), typically responsible for providing regional services such as law enforcement, courts, record-keeping, and infrastructure management for the communities within its boundaries.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49404428c819092dcc9632f5f7b8b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.