Triple
T10887259
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cook County Public Defender's Office |
E257079
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalBasis |
P125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gideon v. Wainwright decision |
E7343
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gideon v. Wainwright decision | Statement: [Cook County Public Defender's Office, legalBasis, Gideon v. Wainwright decision]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gideon v. Wainwright decision Context triple: [Cook County Public Defender's Office, legalBasis, Gideon v. Wainwright decision]
-
A.
Gideon v. Wainwright
chosen
Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that guaranteed the right to court-appointed counsel for criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney.
-
B.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
-
C.
Rochin v. California
Rochin v. California is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that held evidence obtained by methods that "shock the conscience," such as forcibly pumping a suspect’s stomach, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
D.
Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
-
E.
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case that held peremptory jury strikes based solely on gender violate the Equal Protection Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa848804819081b2713ca0bedf06 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d75201e6888190a2bc41a17784eec3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e154e49ab08190b522b5361ac65c01 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 9:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.