Triple

T10887259
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cook County Public Defender's Office E257079 entity
Predicate legalBasis P125 FINISHED
Object Gideon v. Wainwright decision E7343 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gideon v. Wainwright decision | Statement: [Cook County Public Defender's Office, legalBasis, Gideon v. Wainwright decision]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gideon v. Wainwright decision
Context triple: [Cook County Public Defender's Office, legalBasis, Gideon v. Wainwright decision]
  • A. Gideon v. Wainwright chosen
    Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that guaranteed the right to court-appointed counsel for criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney.
  • B. Strickland v. Washington
    Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
  • C. Rochin v. California
    Rochin v. California is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that held evidence obtained by methods that "shock the conscience," such as forcibly pumping a suspect’s stomach, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • D. Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
    The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
  • E. J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
    J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case that held peremptory jury strikes based solely on gender violate the Equal Protection Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa848804819081b2713ca0bedf06 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d75201e6888190a2bc41a17784eec3 completed April 9, 2026, 7:15 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e154e49ab08190b522b5361ac65c01 completed April 16, 2026, 9:30 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.