Triple
T10887253
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cook County Public Defender's Office |
E257079
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasClientEligibilityCriterion |
P1130
|
FINISHED |
| Object | indigency |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: indigency | Statement: [Cook County Public Defender's Office, hasClientEligibilityCriterion, indigency]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasClientEligibilityCriterion Context triple: [Cook County Public Defender's Office, hasClientEligibilityCriterion, indigency]
-
A.
hasMemberCriteria
Indicates that a group, collection, or set is defined or constrained by specific criteria that its members must satisfy.
-
B.
eligibilityContext
Indicates the situational or conditional factors under which an entity qualifies for or is considered eligible for something.
-
C.
hasQualityCriterion
Indicates that something is associated with a specific standard or criterion used to judge its quality.
-
D.
eligibilityCriteria
chosen
Indicates the conditions or requirements that must be satisfied for an entity to qualify for or be considered eligible for something.
-
E.
hasProtectionCriterion
Indicates that something is associated with a specific condition or standard used to determine its protection requirements or status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa848804819081b2713ca0bedf06 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d75201e6888190a2bc41a17784eec3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d70d3943c881908895397eccc3e415 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.