Triple
T10887169
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zimbabwean general election, 2018 |
E257077
|
entity |
| Predicate | ConstitutionalCourtDecision |
P76353
|
FINISHED |
| Object | upheld Emmerson Mnangagwa’s victory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: upheld Emmerson Mnangagwa’s victory | Statement: [Zimbabwean general election, 2018, ConstitutionalCourtDecision, upheld Emmerson Mnangagwa’s victory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ConstitutionalCourtDecision Context triple: [Zimbabwean general election, 2018, ConstitutionalCourtDecision, upheld Emmerson Mnangagwa’s victory]
-
A.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
B.
constitutionalRuling
chosen
Indicates a formal judicial decision determining whether a law, policy, or government action complies with a constitution.
-
C.
SupremeCourtVote
Indicates the voting decision or stance taken by a justice (or justices) in a case before the Supreme Court.
-
D.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
-
E.
ratioDecidendi
Indicates the legal reasoning or principle that forms the binding basis for a court’s decision in a case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa848804819081b2713ca0bedf06 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d75201e6888190a2bc41a17784eec3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d70d3943c881908895397eccc3e415 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.