Triple
T10884393
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona judicial conduct and discipline system |
E257005
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial ethics oversight framework |
C4497
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: judicial ethics oversight framework Context triple: [Arizona judicial conduct and discipline system, instanceOf, judicial ethics oversight framework]
-
A.
judicial ethics code
A judicial ethics code is a formal set of principles and rules that governs the professional conduct, impartiality, and integrity of judges in the performance of their duties.
-
B.
judicial ethics committee
chosen
A judicial ethics committee is a body that reviews, advises on, and enforces standards of ethical conduct for judges to maintain integrity, impartiality, and public confidence in the judiciary.
-
C.
judicial ideal
A judicial ideal is a conceptual standard of fairness, impartiality, and justice that guides how legal decisions ought to be made and how courts should function in society.
-
D.
ethics commission
An ethics commission is an independent body that reviews, advises on, and enforces standards of ethical conduct within an organization, profession, or government.
-
E.
judicial network
A judicial network is a structured system of interconnected courts, judges, and legal institutions that interact through case decisions, precedents, and administrative relationships to shape and apply the law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa848804819081b2713ca0bedf06 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.