Triple
T10884238
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments |
E257001
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial nominating commission |
C27192
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: judicial nominating commission Context triple: [Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, instanceOf, judicial nominating commission]
-
A.
judicial appointments body
chosen
A judicial appointments body is an institution or committee responsible for selecting, recommending, or approving candidates for judicial office, often to promote independence, merit, and transparency in the judiciary.
-
B.
Judicial conference committee
A judicial conference committee is a group of judges and related officials convened to study, discuss, and recommend policies or rules to improve the administration and operation of the court system.
-
C.
United States Senate committee
A United States Senate committee is a specialized group of senators assigned to consider legislation, conduct hearings, and oversee federal agencies and programs within a particular policy area.
-
D.
judicial office
A judicial office is an official position within the judiciary in which an individual is authorized to interpret and apply the law, preside over legal proceedings, and issue binding decisions.
-
E.
judiciary
The judiciary is the branch of government responsible for interpreting laws, resolving disputes, and ensuring justice is administered fairly and in accordance with the constitution and legal principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa848804819081b2713ca0bedf06 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.