Triple
T10871620
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chat ‘N’ Chill beach bar |
E256666
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWildlifeInteraction |
P34896
|
FINISHED |
| Object | stingrays |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: stingrays | Statement: [Chat ‘N’ Chill beach bar, hasWildlifeInteraction, stingrays]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWildlifeInteraction Context triple: [Chat ‘N’ Chill beach bar, hasWildlifeInteraction, stingrays]
-
A.
hasWildlifeActivity
Indicates that wildlife is present in the area and engaging in observable behaviors or movements.
-
B.
hasNearbyWildlife
chosen
Indicates that there is wildlife located close to or in the immediate vicinity of the referenced entity.
-
C.
hasWildlifeSite
Indicates that a location or entity possesses, contains, or is designated as a wildlife site.
-
D.
hasWildlifeIssue
Indicates that an entity is affected by, involved in, or responsible for a problem or conflict related to wildlife.
-
E.
hasWildlifeAccess
Indicates that an entity has the ability, permission, or physical means to reach or interact with wildlife or wildlife habitats.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa848804819081b2713ca0bedf06 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d75186e75c8190bf046ea666faff54 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d70d360c388190a3d829fe8862434f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:21 p.m.