Triple
T1085176
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fourth Dynasty of Egypt |
E24033
|
entity |
| Predicate | dynasticNumber |
P24058
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 4 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4 | Statement: [Fourth Dynasty of Egypt, dynasticNumber, 4]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dynasticNumber Context triple: [Fourth Dynasty of Egypt, dynasticNumber, 4]
-
A.
dynasticType
Indicates the specific kind or category of dynastic relationship or succession pattern that applies between ruling entities or lineages.
-
B.
dynasticStatus
Indicates the relationship between an entity and a ruling dynasty, such as membership in, association with, or status within that dynastic line.
-
C.
dynasticOrigin
Indicates the historical dynasty or ruling family from which an entity originates or descends.
-
D.
dominantDynasty
Indicates that one dynasty holds prevailing power, influence, or control over a given region or period relative to other dynasties.
-
E.
dynasty
Indicates a hereditary ruling line or family that holds power over a state or territory across successive generations.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49404428c819092dcc9632f5f7b8b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b961d0cc8190858296b44fab2f32 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b7407914819092ed933a7316b450 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b8f1097881908932d7eea4331917 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.