Triple
T10827102
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | osmo-pcu |
E255521
|
entity |
| Predicate | isPartOfSolution |
P95952
|
FINISHED |
| Object | open-source GSM network stack |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: open-source GSM network stack | Statement: [osmo-pcu, isPartOfSolution, open-source GSM network stack]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPartOfSolution Context triple: [osmo-pcu, isPartOfSolution, open-source GSM network stack]
-
A.
isSolutionOf
Indicates that one entity is a correct answer or satisfies the conditions of a given problem, equation, or task.
-
B.
admitsSolution
Indicates that a problem, system, or situation allows for or possesses at least one valid solution.
-
C.
providesSolutionFor
Indicates that one entity offers or supplies a remedy, answer, or resolution to a problem, need, or issue associated with another entity.
-
D.
canBeSolvable
Indicates that a problem, situation, or condition has the potential to be resolved or successfully solved under some circumstances.
-
E.
basedOnSolutionOf
Indicates that one entity is derived, developed, or constructed using the solution or outcome produced by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8081448190a9324184f2bd1c26 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d734d2b9f88190b79a7b168d7836c8 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d70d25280c8190b648d7d1958b413a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d7101c96708190808fef73199e8482 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:19 p.m.