Triple
T1082671
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pierrot |
E23980
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleInPlots |
P17462
|
FINISHED |
| Object | victim of pranks |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: victim of pranks | Statement: [Pierrot, roleInPlots, victim of pranks]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInPlots Context triple: [Pierrot, roleInPlots, victim of pranks]
-
A.
plotInvolvement
chosen
Indicates that an entity participates in, contributes to, or is affected by the events or storyline of a narrative work.
-
B.
roleInDialogue
Indicates that an entity participates in a dialogue with a specific conversational role (e.g., speaker, listener, moderator) relative to other participants.
-
C.
roleInTheology
Indicates the specific function, position, or significance an entity holds within a theological system, doctrine, or belief framework.
-
D.
plannedRole
Indicates that an entity is expected or intended to assume a particular role or function in a planned or future context.
-
E.
roleInText
Indicates that an entity participates in a text with a specific function or capacity (e.g., author, editor, character).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493f1ddf48190a99d54b00e99f8ce |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b95e56948190a1e92367ad7240b7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b73f4310819086281f8ec67d1a32 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.