Triple

T10809559
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mrs. Baylock E255059 entity
Predicate killsOrAttemptsToKill P59012 FINISHED
Object those who threaten Damien LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: those who threaten Damien | Statement: [Mrs. Baylock, killsOrAttemptsToKill, those who threaten Damien]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: killsOrAttemptsToKill
Context triple: [Mrs. Baylock, killsOrAttemptsToKill, those who threaten Damien]
  • A. canKill
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or potential to cause the death of another entity.
  • B. kills
    Indicates that one entity causes the death of another entity, ending its life.
  • C. killsByProxy
    Indicates that one entity causes the death of another entity indirectly through an intermediary or agent rather than committing the act personally.
  • D. attemptedToKill chosen
    Indicates that one entity took deliberate action with the intention of causing the death of another entity, regardless of whether the death actually occurred.
  • E. considersKilling
    Indicates that one entity is contemplating or evaluating the possibility of killing another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa61c15c8190a1839550c56e75e1 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d733b6efc48190bb64b5a8fac843c4 completed April 9, 2026, 5:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6f3188f00819094ee8d65b187a333 completed April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:18 p.m.