Triple
T10799923
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Illinois Rules of Evidence |
E254810
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Article IV Relevancy and Its Limits |
E71456
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Article IV Relevancy and Its Limits | Statement: [Illinois Rules of Evidence, hasPart, Article IV Relevancy and Its Limits]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Article IV Relevancy and Its Limits Context triple: [Illinois Rules of Evidence, hasPart, Article IV Relevancy and Its Limits]
-
A.
Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits
chosen
Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits is a section of the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that defines when evidence is considered relevant and sets boundaries on its admissibility in court.
-
B.
“Is Innocence Irrelevant? Collateral Attack on Criminal Judgments”
“Is Innocence Irrelevant? Collateral Attack on Criminal Judgments” is a highly influential legal essay by Judge Henry J. Friendly examining the role of actual innocence in federal habeas corpus review of state criminal convictions.
-
C.
A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law is a book in which Justice Antonin Scalia articulates and defends his textualist approach to statutory and constitutional interpretation in the American legal system.
-
D.
Digest of the Law of Evidence
Digest of the Law of Evidence is a seminal 19th-century legal treatise that systematically organized and clarified the principles of evidence law in England and influenced evidence codes in other common law jurisdictions.
-
E.
The Paradoxes of Legal Science
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa61c15c8190a1839550c56e75e1 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d733366c408190bfd3b57be5ef2440 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:03 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69de566e7d408190946864e28c294075 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 2:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:18 p.m.